Supreme Court: Mother who remarries after the death of the biological father can decide the surname of the child and include it in her new family

Published:

Views: 325Category: Family law

Case Title: MRS. AKELLA LALITHA V/s SRI KONDA HANUMANTHA RAO & ANR
CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 6325-6326 OF 2015; 28TH JULY, 2022
Panel: DINESH MAHESHWARI J. & KRISHNA MURARI J.

Fact of the case: The Appellant married Konda Balaji, son of respondents, on 18.12.2003. A Child was born out of the wedlock on 27.03.2006. However, the husband of the Appellant expired on 14.06.2006. At the time the child was merely 2 ½ months old. Thereafter, the Appellant married Sri Akella Ravi Narasimha Sarma.Presently, the child Master Ahlad Achintya is still a minor aged 16 years and 4 months. On 9th April, 2008, the respondents had filed a petition under Section 10 of the Guardian and Wards Act, 1890 for appointing them as Guardians of Master Ahlad Achintha, son of the appellant. The Trial Court vide Order dated 20.09.2011 dismissed the Petition filed by the respondents and was of the opinion that it would not be appropriate to separate the child from the love and affection of his mother.It however, granted visitation rights to the respondents and directed the Appellant and her husband to bring their child to the house of her parents at Hyderabad once in three months.The Order of the Trial Court was challenged in appeals before the High Court by both the parties. During the course of arguments, it was brought to the notice of the High Court that the surname of the child was changed from Konda to Akella. The High Court orders that (a) Akella Lalitha would be the natural guardian of the child, (b) The Appellant shall complete the formalities for restoration of the surname and father’s surname of the child within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. This common judgment of the High Court is challenged by the appellant in the present appeals before Hon'ble Supreme Court.

Issue : In this case subject matter of dispute between the mother and the parents of the deceased father of the child (grandparents) is the surname given to the child. Andhra Pradesh High Court direction to a mother who remarried another person after death of her first husband to restore surname of a child and further direct that wherever the records permit, the name of the natural father shall be shown and if it is otherwise impermissible, the name of the present husband shall be mentioned as step-father.

[What is Surname?
A surname refers to the name a person shares with other members of that person's family, distinguished from that person's given name or names; a family name. Surname is not only indicative of lineage and should not be understood just in context of history, culture and lineage but more importantly the role it plays is with regard to the social reality along with a sense of being for children in their particular environment. Homogeneity of surname emerges as a mode to create, sustain and display 'family........Additional Information(Legalfree.in)]
;
Supreme Court Observation: The direction of the High Court to include the name of the Appellant’s husband as step-father in documents is almost cruel and mindless of how it would impact the mental health and self-esteem of the child. A name is important as a child derives his identity from it and a difference in name from his family would act as a constant reminder of the factum of adoption and expose the child to unnecessary questions hindering a smooth, natural relationship between him and his parents. We, therefore, see nothing unusual in Appellant mother, upon remarriage having given the child the surname of her husband or even giving the child in adoption to her husband.

Decision: In this case while directing for change of surname of the child, the High Court has traversed beyond pleadings and such directions are liable to be set aside on this ground.. With the above observations the directions of the High Court so far as the surname of the child is concerned are set aside.As a consequence, the appeals stand allowed in part.

Supreme Court Judgment: Click here to download

************************************ Article End here **************************************

Note : This article is written by Adv. Alok Kumar practicing advocate in Delhi High Court, for any suggestions you may contact here care@legalfree.in

Tags

About the author

Adv. Alok Kumar

Advocate, Delhi High Court & District Courts

LL.B., Faculty of Law, Delhi University

Alok & Associates (2A)

Disclaimer

All material is for general information only and does not constitute professional advice. Users should seek independent legal or professional guidance. The owner/author is not liable for any loss arising from the use of this site’s content or from external links provided.

DISCLAIMER

As per the rules of the Bar Council of India, lawyers and law firms are not permitted to solicit their work or advertise in any manner. By clicking on the “I Agree” button, the user agrees and acknowledges as under: There has been no advertisement, personal communication, solicitation, invitation or any other inducement of any sort whatsoever by or on behalf of Alok & Associates (2A) or any of its members to solicit any work through this website.

  • All material and information (except any statutory instruments or judicial precedents or court orders / directives / guidelines / regulations / judgments / notifications) on this website is the property of Alok & Associates (2A) , and no part thereof shall be used, with or without adaptation, without the express prior written consent or approval from Alok & Associates (2A).
  • The user(s) wishes to gain more information about Alok & Associates (2A) for his/her/their own information and use.
  • All information about Alok & Associates (2A) on this website is being provided to the user(s) only on his/her/their specific request and any information obtained or materials downloaded from this website is completely at the volition of user(s); and any transmission, receipt or use of this site would not create any lawyer-client relationship.
  • The information provided on this website is solely available at the request of the user(s) for informational purposes only. It should not be interpreted as a soliciting or advertisement.
  • Alok & Associates (2A) assumes no liability for the interpretation and/or use of the information available on this website, neither does it offer a warranty of any kind, nor express or implicit authorization of the content included in www.legalfree.in not even through a hyperlink, without express and written consent from www.legalfree.in.
  • The content of articles published in this website is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter and specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances from your legal advisor. The content available on this website does not constitute, and shall not be construed, as legal advice or a substitute for legal advice.
  • Alok & Associates (2A) is not liable for any consequence of any action taken by the user(s) relying on material/information provided on this website or through any external links thereon.
  • This website is a resource for informational purposes only and though intended, is not promised or guaranteed, to be complete or updated. Alok & Associates (2A) does not warrant that the information contained on this website "www.legalfree.in" and its social media accounts like Youtube Channel handle "Youtube.com/@legalfree" is accurate or complete, and hereby disclaims any and all liability to any person for any loss or damage caused by errors or omissions, whether such errors or omissions result from negligence, accident or any other cause.
I Disagree