YouTube
Print
October 09 2025THE SUSPENSION OF ADVOCATE RAKESH KISHORE: A CASE STUDY ON LEGAL ETHICS AND DISCIPLINE
DISCLAIMER (EDUCATIONAL PURPOSE ONLY) This article is intended solely for educational and informational purposes. It is based on publicly available documents and general legal principles. The content does not constitute legal advice, professional opinion, or an official statement of any authority. All names and references are used only to discuss professional ethics, conduct, and disciplinary mechanisms within the legal framework. Readers are advised not to interpret or rely upon this material for any legal proceeding or personal matter.The objective of this publication is to promote awareness and understanding of legal ethics and professional responsibility among law students, practitioners, and researchers.
Source:https://www.barcouncilofindia.org FACT OF CASE In early October 2025, an incident in the Supreme Court of India raised serious questions about professional conduct within the legal fraternity. During proceedings before the Hon’ble Chief Justice of India, an advocate enrolled with the Bar Council of Delhi reportedly removed his shoes and attempted to throw them toward the Chief Justice. Court security intervened immediately, preventing any further disturbance. The incident shocked the legal community, as such behavior violated the dignity expected of officers of the court.Following this, the Bar Council of India (BCI) took cognizance of the matter and issued an interim suspension order under the Advocates Act, 1961 and Part VI, Chapter II of the Bar Council of India Rules on Standards of Professional Conduct and Etiquette. The suspension prevents the advocate from appearing, pleading, or practicing before any court or tribunal in India pending disciplinary proceedings. BAR COUNCIL OF INDIA RESPONSE The BCI’s response was prompt and decisive. In its order dated 6 October 2025, the Council emphasized that advocates must uphold the dignity of the legal profession and maintain respect toward the judiciary. The order cited specific rules requiring advocates to conduct themselves with dignity and to avoid any conduct that may lower the image of the legal community or interfere with judicial proceedings.The Bar Council of Delhi was instructed to ensure full compliance — including immediate communication of the suspension to all courts and tribunals within its jurisdiction. The advocate was directed to file an affidavit of compliance within 48 hours, confirming that they would not appear or act in any matter during the suspension. These steps illustrate the BCI’s determination to preserve discipline and ethical conduct in the profession. IMPACT ON LEGAL PROFESSION This incident has sparked intense discussion across India’s legal circles. Many senior advocates and bar associations have condemned the act as a serious breach of courtroom decorum. The episode highlights that the privilege to practice law is inseparable from the duty to respect the courts and judicial officers.The suspension serves as a strong warning: professional misconduct, especially in the courtroom, can attract immediate and strict disciplinary action. It reinforces the principle that lawyers are custodians of justice and must maintain the highest ethical and moral standards. The case also underscores the Bar Council’s proactive role in safeguarding the integrity of the legal system. HOW THE CJI HANDLED THIS SITUATION The Hon’ble Chief Justice of India responded with remarkable composure and restraint. Instead of reacting emotionally or allowing the situation to disturb the proceedings, the CJI maintained the court’s dignity and allowed due process to take its course. The CJI’s calm approach and reliance on institutional mechanisms reflected the strength of judicial discipline and leadership.This response set an example for the entire judiciary — that even in moments of provocation, justice must be guided by fairness, procedure, and dignity rather than impulse. WHAT FRESH LAWYERS NEED TO LEARN For newly enrolled lawyers and law students, this case is an invaluable lesson in professional ethics. The courtroom is not a place for confrontation or personal outburst; it is a temple of justice where decorum and discipline are non-negotiable. Advocates must remember that every action, word, and gesture contributes to the public perception of the legal profession. Fresh lawyers must cultivate patience, respect, and emotional intelligence. They should familiarize themselves with the Bar Council of India Rules on Professional Conduct, particularly those concerning behavior toward the court and colleagues. Ultimately, an advocate’s reputation is built not only on legal skill but also on integrity, humility, and respect for judicial institutions. WHAT ARE THE LEGAL REMEDIES AGAINST SUSPENSION An advocate who faces suspension by the Bar Council of India or a State Bar Council is not left without recourse. The Advocates Act, 1961 provides several legal remedies: 1. Right to Show Cause:Under the BCI’s order, the suspended advocate is given an opportunity to explain or show cause within a specified period (usually 15 days). This ensures compliance with the principles of natural justice — the right to be heard before any final disciplinary decision. 2. Appeal to the Bar Council of India (If Suspension by State Bar Council):If the order originates from a State Bar Council, the advocate may appeal to the Bar Council of India under Section 37 of the Advocates Act, 1961. 3. Appeal to the Supreme Court of India:Under Section 38 of the Advocates Act, 1961, an advocate aggrieved by an order of the Bar Council of India may file an appeal before the Supreme Court of India within 60 days. The Supreme Court has the authority to confirm, modify, or reverse the disciplinary order. 4. Judicial Review under Article 226 or 32:In exceptional circumstances, the advocate may approach the High Court under Article 226 or the Supreme Court under Article 32 of the Constitution of India, challenging the disciplinary action on grounds such as violation of natural justice, procedural irregularity, or constitutional rights. NOTE: These remedies ensure that while professional discipline is enforced, fairness and procedural justice remain paramount. The law balances the dignity of the legal profession with the rights of individual practitioners.
Author
Adv. ALOK KUMAR
Advocate Serving Delhi NCR
Delhi High Court & District CourtsLL.B.▪︎Faculty of Law▪︎Delhi University
Comments are not allowed on this article.
